Cannabis use alters DNA to increase disease risk, study says

Cannabis alters DNA, leading to genetic mutations that may raise the risk of serious diseases for users of the drug and future generations. This is the conclusion of a new study by researchers from The University of Western Australia.
[Marijuana joints]
Researchers say chemicals in cannabis alter DNA, which can cause gene mutations that raise the risk of cancer and other diseases.

Cannabis – also referred to as marijuana – is the most commonly used illicit drug in the United States, though legalization of the drug for medical or recreational use is increasing across the country.

According to the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA), around 22.2 million people in the U.S. have used marijuana in the past month, and studies have suggested that use of the drug has increased significantly in recent years.

Given the high number of individuals using cannabis, it is important to establish its effects on health.

Study authors Albert Stuart Reece and Gary Hulse – both of the School of Psychiatry and Clinical Sciences at the University of Western Australia – note that previous research has suggested a link between cannabis use and increased risk of severe illnesses.

The mechanisms underlying this association, however, have been unclear. And researchers have had little insight into how cannabis use may affect future generations.

Cannabis-related DNA damage can be passed to future generations

To investigate further, the team conducted an in-depth analysis of previous studies and literary material assessing the effect of cannabis use on cells and how this might relate to disease risk.

The researchers recently published their findings in the journal Mutation Research/Fundamental and Molecular Mechanisms of Mutagenesis.

They found that the chemical properties of cannabis – including tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), the active ingredient of the drug – interact with and alter users’ DNA, which can lead to gene mutations that increase the risk of disease.

“With cannabis use increasing globally in recent years, this has a concerning impact for the population,” says Reece.

The researchers point out that even if a user does not develop an illness as a result of such mutations, the “unseen” damage can be passed to their children, and even their grandchildren, increasing their risk of disease.

“Even if a mother has never used cannabis in her life, the mutations passed on by a father’s sperm can cause serious and fatal illnesses in their children.

The parents may not realize that they are carrying these mutations, which can lie dormant and may only affect generations down the track, which is the most alarming aspect.”

Albert Stuart Reece

Reece explains that when cannabis chemicals alter a person’s DNA, this can slow the growth of cells. This may have severe consequences for fetal growth, causing underdeveloped organs or limbs, and it can spur childhood cancers.

“The worst cancers are reported in the first few years of life in children exposed in utero to cannabis effects,” notes Reece.

The authors conclude that their findings may have important implication for researchers, healthcare professionals, and policymakers when it comes to regulating cannabis use, and there should be focus on protecting individuals who are most vulnerable to the negative health implications of the drug.

-Honor Whiteman

How Mood and Stress Reduce Lifespan

A study, published this week in Molecular Psychiatry, finds the genetic basis of a poorly understood phenomenon. Mood and stress are known to contribute to shortened lifespans, and researchers may now have identified the genes that are involved.
[Blue genes]
An in-depth study charts the genetics involved in the shortening of life in response to mood and stress.

A team from Indiana University School of Medicine and the Scripps Research Institute, CA, conducted a multifaceted project investigating the genetic basis of premature aging in response to stress and psychiatric illness.

Using human participants and Caenorhabditis elegans, one of planet Earth’s most-studied worms, the researchers delved into this intractable question.

They managed to identify a raft of genes that seem to control the impact of mood and stress responses on the longevity of an organism.

A gene called ANK3 was of particular interest and appeared to play a key role in the process.

The role of ANK3

ANK3 codes for a protein called ankyrin-G. This protein is involved in certain types of synaptic transmission (messages being sent between neurons). Ankyrin-G has previously been associated with bipolar disorder, autism, and schizophrenia.

This gene is a prime candidate for uncovering the links between emotional responses and premature aging.

“We were looking for genes that might be at the interface between mood, stress, and longevity. We have found a series of genes involved in mood disorders and stress disorders which also seem to be involved in longevity.”

Lead author Dr. Alexander B. Niculescu III

After analyzing the genes further, Dr. Niculescu and his team found that the genes in question changed their rates of expression with age. When examining the genes of individuals who experienced significant stress or mood disorders – for instance, people who had committed suicide – they noticed shifts in the expression of these genes.

The changes are of the type that would normally be associated with shorter lifespans and premature aging.

Earlier research, carried out by one of the co-authors of the current study, Michael Petrascheck, Ph.D., found that when C. elegans was exposed to mianserin – an antidepressant – the animals lived longer. This acted as the starting point for the current project.

Stress, aging, genes, and worms

To examine the roles of genes in mood, stress, and lifespan, the team embarked on a thorough program of experiments:

  • Firstly, the team investigated the genetic changes mianserin made to C. elegans. The drug was found to affect 231 genes that were then cross-referenced to the human genome. In total, 347 corresponding, similar genes were identified in humans.
  • These 347 genes were compared with the genomes of 3,577 older adults. Of these genes, 134 overlapped with depressive symptoms in humans.
  • The researchers used a database containing genes already known to be involved in psychiatric disorders. They also used Niculescu lab’s Convergent Functional Genomics approach to prioritize the genes in order of their involvement in mood and stress disorders. The top scoring gene was ANK3, a gene that is becoming well known for its role in psychiatric disorders.
  • Focus then shifted back to C. elegans. The team used strains of the worm that had been bred with inactive ANK3 genes. These worms were tested under the effects of mianserin and oxidative stress. ANK3 is known to increase with age and mianserin keeps these levels down. However, they found that mianserin needs at least some ANK3 to provide its life-extending effects.
  • Next, 700 blood samples from psychiatric patients and people who had committed suicide were examined. ANK3 was found in higher levels in older patients and those who had committed suicide.
  • A panel of biomarkers was collected by adding some of the other high-scoring genes from the Convergent Functional Genomics investigation. When taken as a group, they gave an even stronger result than ANK3 on its own. The correlation was particularly strong for the suicide group, showing that the cluster of genes the team had identified did seem to play a role in psychiatric conditions.

The next question is how these genes might affect longevity. It was shown that the genes that overlapped most with mood- and stress-modulated longevity seemed to be involved in mitochondrial dysfunction. This relationship makes sense; a link between mitochondrial dysfunction and aging is steadily growing support from other research.

The authors of the study conclude that “these studies uncover ANK3 and other genes in our dataset as biological links between mood, stress, and lifespan, that may be biomarkers for biological age as well as targets for personalized preventive or therapeutic interventions.”

As ever, more work will be necessary to back up the findings, but the thorough nature of the investigation and its agreement with other studies gives future researchers a strong platform to build upon.

-Tim Newman

Victims Of Bullying At Increased Risk Of Anxiety Disorders And Depression Later On

Children who are bullied are at an increased risk of developing anxiety disorders and depression when they become adults, according to a new study published in JAMA Psychiatry.

The study identified that bullying is not simply a ‘harmless rite of passage’, as it can also cause serious adverse health outcomes in the victims and perpetrators, in the form of depression, physical health problems and behavior and emotional problems, psychotic symptoms, and loss of motivation.

The researchers, led by William E. Copeland, Ph.D., of Duke University Medical Center, evaluated the impact that childhood bullying can have on both the victim and the perpetrator in later life. They wanted to determine whether it can be predictor of psychiatric problems in adulthood.

A total of 1,420 people participated in the study, they were assessed regularly from the age of 9 until they turned 16. They were categorized as either bullies, victims, a combination of both, or neither.

The authors said:

“Bullying is not just a harmless rite of passage or an inevitable part of growing up. Victims of bullying are at increased risk for emotional disorders in adulthood. Bullies/victims are at highest risk and are most likely to think about or plan suicide. These problems are associated with great emotional and financial costs to society.”

The results showed that victims, as well as bullies/victims, were more likely to have psychiatric disorders in adulthood and experience family hardship and childhood psychiatric problems.

Factoring in family hardship and childhood psychiatric problems, the researchers found that victims of bullying had a high rate of agoraphobia, generalized anxiety, and panic disorder. In addition, they found that bullies/victims were at high risk of depression, panic disorder and suicidality. Bullies were only at risk for antisocial personality disorder.

The authors concluded:

“Bullying can be easily assessed and monitored by health professionals and school personnel, and effective interventions that reduce victimization are available. Such interventions are likely to reduce human suffering and long-term health costs and provide a safer environment for children to grow up in.”

It should be noted that teens suffering from depression tend to be more at risk of being bullied because of difficulties making friends. This could suggest that the victims themselves are more prone to being bullied because of pre-existing psychiatric problems.

Psychiatric disorders more common among workaholics, study finds

If your life seems to revolve around your job, so much so that your relationships and social life suffer, then you’re likely to fall under the definition of a “workaholic.” It is no surprise that workaholism can induce stress, but a new study suggests that it may also be associated with psychiatric disorders.
[An overworked businessman]
Researchers found workaholics were more likely to meet criteria for OCD, ADHD, anxiety, and depression.

Published in the journal PLOS One, the study found that workaholics were more likely to have anxiety, depression, obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) than non-workaholics.

According to the study authors – including Cecilie Schou Andreassen of the Department of Psychological Science at the University of Bergen, Norway – workaholism has been defined as “being overly concerned about work, driven by an uncontrollable work motivation, and to investing so much time and effort to work that it impairs other important life areas.”

With an increasing amount of Americans facing longer working hours and increasing job demands, workaholism is believed to be a common occurrence, with some studies estimating that it affects around 10 percent of the U.S. workforce.

Andreassen and colleagues note that previous studies have suggested a link between workaholism and psychiatric disorders; they set out to gain a better understanding of this association.

The Bergen Work Addiction Scale

The team analyzed data of 16,426 working adults of a median age of 37 years.

The researchers used the Bergen Work Addiction Scale to identify workaholism among the subjects, which involved participants rating how often the following statements applied to them in the past year:

  • You think about ways to free up more time for work
  • You spend significantly more time working than originally planned
  • You work to reduce feelings of guilt, anxiety, helplessness, or depression
  • Others have told you to work less but you don’t listen to them
  • You become stressed if you are prevented from working
  • Work is prioritized before hobbies, leisure activities, and/or exercise
  • You work to the extent that it negatively impacts your health.

Participants rated each statement on a scale of 1 (never) to 5 (always). They were deemed a workaholic If they scored “often” or “always” on four or more statements, and this occurred for 7.8 percent of participants.

Workaholics more likely to meet criteria for psychiatric disorders

Additionally, all participants were assessed for psychiatric symptoms through the Adult ADHD Self-Report Scale, the Obsession-Compulsive Inventory-Revised, and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale.

Compared with non-workaholics, the team found that workaholics were significantly more likely to have symptoms of psychiatric disorders.

A total of 32.7 percent of workaholics met ADHD criteria, compared with 12.7 percent of non-workaholics.

OCD criteria were met for 25.6 percent of workaholics, while only 8.7 percent of non-workaholics met OCD criteria.

Among workaholics, 33.8 percent met the criteria for anxiety and 8.9 percent met the criteria for depression, compared with 11.9 percent and 2.6 percent, respectively, for non-workaholics.

Younger, single, and highly educated individuals with higher socioeconomic status were most likely to be workaholics, the researchers report.

Furthermore, workaholism was found to be more prevalent among individuals with managerial roles, those who worked in the private sector, and those who were self-employed.

Overall, the researchers say their results indicate that certain sociodemographic groups may be at increased risk of workaholism, and that workaholics may be more likely to have co-existing psychiatric conditions.

The authors add:

“Clearly, more research is warranted to elucidate these important relationships further. In the meantime, it is recommended that physicians and therapists should not take for granted that a seemingly successful workaholic does not have ADHD-related clinical features.

However, more research is needed to examine whether workaholism is totally negative for all individuals as it may be that workaholism may serve an important structuring function for those with mental health problems and those with social dysfunction.”

-Honor Whiteman

Highly Generous People May Be Less Envious of Others’ Fortune

Our personal level of happiness and generosity appears to depend on how we feel about others’ fortunes in comparison to our own, according to a new study at the University College London (UCL) in which researchers developed an equation to predict happiness levels.

The findings show that, on average, inequality tends to reduce happiness levels. For the most part, people tend to feel happier when they win the same amount as their partner (not less and not more).

But when the winnings are not equal, there is great variability in each person’s levels of happiness. For some, happiness levels are reduced when they have less than others (perhaps from envy, suggest the researchers), but for others, happiness levels are reduced when they have more than others (perhaps from guilt). This variability in happiness can accurately predict future generosity.

In the first experiment, participants who played a gambling game were able to see whether or not their partner won at the same game. On average, when a participant won some money, they were happier when their partner also won the same money compared to when their partner lost. Similarly, when people lost a game, they were happier when their partner also lost compared to when their partner won.

“Our equation can predict exactly how happy people will be based not only on what happens to them but also what happens to the people around them,” said one of the study’s co-lead authors, Dr. Robb Rutledge (UCL Institute of Neurology and Max Planck UCL Centre for Computational Psychiatry and Aging Research).

“On average we are less happy if others get more or less than us, but this varies a lot from person to person. Interestingly, the equation allows us to predict how generous an individual will be in a separate scenario when they are asked how they would like to split a small amount of money with another person. Based on exactly how inequality affects their happiness, we can predict which individuals will be altruistic.”

For example, people who feel less happy when they have more than their neighbor are more likely to be generous with their own money, while those who feel envious when others have more are less likely to be generous.

“Our results suggest that generosity towards strangers relates to how our happiness is affected by the inequalities we experience in our daily life,” said study co-leader and graduate student Archy de Berker  at the UCL Institute of Neurology.

“The people who gave away half of their money when they had the opportunity showed no envy when they experienced inequality in a different task but showed a lot of guilt. By contrast, those who kept all the money for themselves displayed no signs of guilt in the other task but displayed a lot of envy.”

For the experiment in generosity, 47 participants who did not know each other completed several tasks in small groups. In one task, they were asked how they would like to anonymously split a small amount of money with another person that they had just met.

In another task, they played a gambling game in which they could win or lose money. They were told that they would be able to see what another person received from the same game. In this way, participants could win the same or different amount as their partner, sometimes getting more and sometimes getting less. Throughout this experiment, participants were asked how happy they felt at regular intervals.

On average, participants who felt less happy about getting more than their partners gave away 30 percent of the money. On the other hand, participants who felt the least happy about getting less than others gave only 10 percent.

The participants’ generosity was not dependent on who the partner was or which partner they said they preferred. This suggests that people were acting according to stable personality traits rather than specific feelings about the other player.

“This is the first time that people’s generosity has been directly linked to how inequality affects their happiness. Economists have had difficulty explaining why some people are more generous than others, and our experiments offers an explanation,” said de Berke.

“The task may prove to be a useful way of measuring empathy, which could offer insight into social disorders such as borderline personality disorder. Such methods could help us better understand certain aspects of social disorders, such as indifference to the suffering of others.”

The findings are published in the journal Nature Communications.

-Traci Pedersen

How to Tidy Your Home Mindfully

Marie Kondo debunks myths of decluttering so city dwellers can keep a tidy home

Across the nation, apartment sizes in urban areas are trending toward smaller units. The average unit size in the U.S. fell to 950 square feet in 2012 to 2013, fifty square feet less than a decade ago. Developers in cities are building far more studios and one-bedrooms to meet the needs of higher numbers of singles and couples living alone in urban areas. The development of two-bedroom and larger units has significantly decreased in urban areas.

A major trend in city living around the world is the micro unit—tiny living spaces typically less than 350 square feet, often modular.  A study by the Urban Land Institute found that consumer research shows a strong consumer interest in micro units, driven by the need for more affordable rent and compact living.

Regulations in the past have required minimum square footage to qualify as a new dwelling unit. In New York and Philadelphia, new dwelling unit must be at least 400 square feet, but this requirement was waived by Mayor Bloomberg, who initiated a 2012 design competition for micro units. These units have been prefabricated in Brooklyn and are being installed in a Manhattan complex called My Micro NY on the East side. The 55 units range from 260 to 360 square feet and are being rented for $2000 to $3000 a month. San Francisco passed new legislation to allow trial micro units as small as 220 square feet in 2012. Washington D.C. has set the minimum at 220 square feet. Boston has a 450 square feet requirement, which was waived for a micro unit development project.

If you thought the U.S. micro units are small, Tokyo residents are living in geki-sema share houses. At 50 to 75 square feet, these tiny units are more like storage lockers than houses and cost $586 monthly.

City dwellers are all too familiar with the problem of making small spaces work. We tend to store objects from various stages of our lives, and our possessions continue to grow around us like layers of dust. There is no routine or natural occasion to review or discard objects that have lost their function unless triggered by events like moving to a new home. But the problem is that during those periods of transition, stress is already high and time limited, so it’s an inopportune time to start tidying.

Creative Commons
Source: Creative Commons

It comes as no surprise that the New York Times #1 best-seller The Life-Changing Magic of Tidying Up: The Japanese Art of Decluttering and Organizing is written by an astute Japanese author Marie Kondo, who has dedicated her life to the pursuit of tidying living spaces. The book is keenly insightful and meditative, inspired by principles found in feng shui and meditation.

Her streamlined method is faithfully represented—from her to-the-point writing style and logical flow of concise points to very compact size of the book itself. She wastes no time or space, and each anecdote illustrates a point. She clarifies common tidying misconceptions and offers practical specific techniques like folding (video here), but her work goes beyond the physical aspect of decluttering and the process is deeply psychological as well.

Here are ten common tidying myths debunked by her book:

Myth #1. Cleaning a little each day is effective.
Kondo points out that this common misconception leads to a constant unending cycle of tidying and does not alter one’s mindset. She instead recommends one concentrated effort or a “tidying festival.”

Myth #2. I’m just not a very organized or tidy person, and I’ll probably always be this way.
People are often discouraged by old negative notions that they have about themselves—often driven by perceptions other people have put onto them. “I’m just a messy person” or “My mother always said I was disorganized my whole life.” Behavioral change requires a realization that you don’t have to be constrained by this negative self-image. Kondo recognizes this problem and contends that every person has the ability to tidy and that it’s not a characteristic of a person but rather something you can learn and change.

Myth #3. Tidying is only an action.
Kondo emphasizes that tidying is about changing one’s mind-set and not just an action. Can our space reflect how we want to live life? She engages the reader to imagine their perfect living space in detail. This visualization exercise allows one to form a clear goal and set an intention that connects to a deeper reflection and mindfulness of one’s desired lifestyle. Kondo points out that “tidying is just a tool, not the final destination.”

Myth #4. Storage is a solution.
Aren’t stacking plastic bins the right solution to a clutter problem? Wrong. Kondo points out that focusing on storage is faulty and leads to hoarding objects that are no longer necessary or useful or that you even know are there. She emphasizes that the first major step is actually discarding rather than the storage or placement of objects.

Myth #5. Tidy by location, one room at a time.
The location approach does not work because objects of the same kind are typically stored in multiple locations in the household. Kondo recommends that you bring out everything of the same kind at once (e.g., clothes, books, papers) to discard by category, not location.

Myth #6. There is no specific order to tidying.
Kondo’s method outlines a clear and distinct order of tidying. Her method parallels exposure therapy methods for those with hoarding or anxiety disorders—start with categories of objects that are less stressful to discard and end with the most challenging. She strongly discourages starting with categories of objects that have sentimental attachment because it is the most challenging to part with.

Myth #7. Whether I should keep an object depends on how potentially useful it is.
Kondo’s standard for whether to discard an object is not tied with a formulaic calculation of its current, past, or future use. She focuses on one’s intuitive emotional connection to the object—the sense of joy that it brings to our lives. Her method is aligned with the central tenets of the positive psychology of goal setting, which focuses on highlighting strengths over weaknesses: “we should be choosing what we want to keep, not what we want to get rid of.” Connecting with feelings of hope and optimism and keeping objects that “spark joy” is more effective than an approach based on getting rid of negative objects.

Myth #8. You can just deal with objects that are out of order and leave them in their natural space when tidying.
When items remain in the same physical location, like books on shelves, Kondo notes that you compromise your ability to truly be mindful of the object and thus cannot truly consider whether you should discard it. She recommends instead bringing out each category—from books to clothes—into plain view on the floor and touch each object to figure out your connection to it. Be mindful and touch each object to figure out if you should keep it. This provides a more effective platform from which to select objects to discard.

Myth #9. If I wish to hold onto something, that must mean that it’s providing me some joy in my life.
Sometimes the reason that you are holding onto an object is not because it’s brings you joy, but because it’s too difficult to let it go. Kondo brings up the relatable case that piece of clothing you never wear because it doesn’t look good on you, but looked great in the store. She encourages a mental shift—to acknowledge that that piece of clothing has already served its purpose by bringing you the joy of getting it at the store and the subsequent knowledge that the color/style/shape doesn’t work for you. Letting go starts by acknowledging the role that an object has already played in your life, rather than holding onto the very low likelihood that it will serve some future purpose.  

Myth #10. It’s just the space that I live in, nothing more.
Living spaces are a reflection of one’s mind, mood, and the care we take for ourselves. In turn, a cluttered space can exacerbate a frenetic mind and generate a sense of unease. You likely work less effectively or are more distracted if your work space is cluttered. Building a calm and grounding space in your home and at work builds a strong foundation to center yourself in general. Kondo observes: “Your real life begins after putting your house in order.”

With living spaces around the world becoming increasingly smaller, the need for decluttering grows ever more pressing. Kondo’s method allows us to consider with intention and awareness how we can surround ourselves in a way that brings us joy. After discarding unecessary items and tidying your home, you might just find yourself lighter and with an improved sense of clarity.

Let the tidying festival begin.

Marlynn Wei, MD, JD, Urban Survival

How mindless leaders can create workplace problems

Why we need mindful leaders

Most leadership books and training programs focus on how leaders can achieve more—do more, better, faster, with spectacular results. We’ve become obsessed with continuous improvement at increasing speed, with resulting rising stress levels to leaders and their followers and deteriorating relationships.  Mindfulness as both a leadership practice and workplace culture holds the promise to bring back balance and better health.

Most contemporary management and leadership literature is a predictive recasting of 19th and 20th century institutional thinking-multitasking, bigger, better, faster; planning, analysis and problem solving. Work on steroids.

While it is true that the effectiveness of leaders is determined by the results they achieve, those results are an outcome of the impact the leaders have on others. Behavior is driven by thinking and emotions. Thinking and emotions can be a result of mindfulness or mindlessness.

Neuroscience research clearly established that we act, decide and choose as a result of inner forces, often unconscious, and the brain’s reactive and protective mechanisms often rule us. Research also points to the existence of emotions being contagious and viral in the workplaces, often initiated by the emotional states of leaders.

There’s a price to pay for our breakneck speed to continuously improve, and produce.

In an article in Forbes magazine, professors Cyril Bouquet and Ben Bryant, citing the disastrous collision of two Boeing 747’s in the Canary Islands in 1977, killing 583 people, was a case of poor attention management. They argue that two kinds of attention disorders exacerbate the difficulties companies face in economic downturns-fixation and relaxation. In the case of fixation, the leaders are too preoccupied with a few central signals or information; they ignore everything else. With respect to relaxation, Bouquet and Bryant contend that excessive relaxation follows sustained periods of high concentration. The authors argue that mindfulness can lessen the attention problems of fixation and relaxation.

The demands of leadership can produce what is known as “power stress,” a side effect of being in a position of power and influence that often leaves even the best leaders physically and emotionally drained. As a result, leaders can easily find themselves moving from an “approach” orientation to their work-emotionally open, engaged and innovative-to an “avoidance” orientation that is characterized by aversion, irritability, aggression, fear and close-mindedness.

If leaders believe they don’t have the time to work through all aspects of a problem they are inclined to be narrow in perspective and take cognitive shortcuts, and become more impulsive and reactive. Their actions, in effect become “mindless” and automatic.

Daniel Siegel, a neuroscientist and author of The Mindful Brain: Reflection and Attunement in the Cultivation of Well-Being, contends that a corporate culture of cognitive shortcuts results in oversimplication, curtailed curiosity, reliance on ingrained beliefs and the development of perceptional blind spots. He argues that mindfulness practices enable individuals to jettison judgment and develop more flexible feelings toward what before may have been mental events they tried to avoid, or towards which they had intense averse reactions.

David Rock, writing in Psychology Today argues that “busy people who run our companies and institutions …tend to spend little time thinking about themselves and other people, but a lot of time thinking about strategy, data and systems. As a result the circuits involved in thinking about oneself and other people, the medial prefrontal cortex, tend to be not too well developed.” Rock says “speaking to an executive about mindfulness can be a bit like speaking to a classical musician about jazz.”

In the East, mindfulness developed in Hindu, Buddhist, Taoist and other traditions as a component of yoga and meditation practice, and was designed to free the mind of unwholesome habits. In the West mindfulness is an element of many Jewish, Christian, Muslim and North American aboriginal practices designed for spiritual growth.

Over the past decade, researchers and mental health professionals have been discovering that both ancient and modern mindfulness practices hold great promise for ameliorating virtually every kind of psychological suffering–from everyday worry, dissatisfaction and neurotic habits to more serious problems with anxiety, depression, substance abuse and related conditions. The exploration and practice of mindfulness has grown on a global scale. Used now in settings ranging from preschools to prisons, mindfulness, once only studied by scientists and religious practitioners, is making its way into the mainstream.

So what exactly is mindfulness?

Jon Kabat-Zinn, founder of the Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction Clinic at the University of Massachusetts Medical School, describes mindfulness as “paying attention in a particular way, on purpose, in the present moment and nonjudgmentally.” Other definitions are: “bringing one’s complete attention to the present experience on a moment-to-moment basis,” and  “it includes a quality of compassion, acceptance and loving-kindness.”

The three foundational elements of mindfulness-objectivity, openness, and observation-create a tripod that stabilizes the mind’s attentional lens. This enables the mind to become conscious of the mind itself and thus become liberated from the common ways in which it is imprisoned by its own preoccupations. This is why, through mindfulness practice, we can transform self-created suffering into personal liberation. As we engage in mindful awareness practices, we have the potential to develop long-term personality traits from intentionally created mindful states. Research has suggested that these mindfulness traits include the capacity to suspend judgments, to act in awareness of our moment-to-moment experience, to achieve emotional equilibrium or equanimity, to describe our internal world with language.

Mindfulness meditation comes in 2 distinct forms: formal meditation: when you intentionally take time out of your day to embark on a meditative practice; and informal meditation, when you go into a focused and meditative state of mind as you go about your daily activities.

There are 7 key elements to mindfulness:

  • Paying attention: Focusing 100% of your attention on whatever you are doing
  • Non-judging: taking the role of an impartial observer to whatever your current experience is, and not judging whether things are good or bad.
  • Patience: cultivating the understanding that things must develop in their own time.
  • Being in the present moment. Being aware of how things are right now in the present moment, not as they were in the past, or how they might be in the future.
  • Non-reactivity. Our brains are built to have you react automatically, without thinking. Mindfulness encourages you to respond to your experience rather than react to your thoughts. Mindfulness is a deliberate and intentional choice.
  • Beginner’s mind: having the willingness to observe the world as if it was your first time doing so. This creates an openness that is essential to being mindful.
  • Trust: having trust in yourself, your intuition, and your abilities.
  • Non-striving: the state of not doing anything, just simply accepting that things are happening in the moment just as they are supposed to. For people from the Western countries like the United States, this seems to be one of the more difficult components.
  • Acceptance: completely accepting the thoughts, feelings, sensations, and beliefs that you have, and understanding that they are simply those things only.
  • Open-heartedness. Mindfulness is not just about the head or brain, it’s about the heart and spirit as well. To be open-hearted is to bring a quality of kindness, compassion, warmth and friendliness to our experience.
  • Non-attachment: avoidance of attaching meaning to thoughts and feelings, or connecting a given thought to a feeling. Instead, let a thought or feeling come in and pass without connecting it to anything, observing them exactly as they are.

What are the benefits and impacts of mindfulness on leaders and the workplace?

In tough economic times, there’s often a knee-jerk reactive argument for panic, pessimism and “getting tough” most of which generate a culture of fear. Mindfulness, practiced extensively in organizations, can be a powerful antidote to the fear and aggression tendencies.

Buddhist trained HR executive, Michael Carroll, author of the Mindful Leader: Awakening Your Natural Management Skills Through Mindfulness Meditation applies the key principles of mindfulness and how they could apply to leaders of organizations. He argues that mindfulness in leaders and their organizations can:

  • Heal toxic workplace cultures where anxiety and stress impede creativity and performance;
  • Cultivate courage and confidence in spite of workplace difficulties in economic downturns;
  • Pursue organizational goals without neglecting the here and now;
  • Lead with wisdom and gentleness, not only with ambition, relentless drive and power;
  • Develop innate leadership talents.

Since 2001, through the work of neuroscientist Richard Davidson and others, we’ve learned that left prefrontal cortex activity, associated with higher states of personal growth, meaning and purpose, measure at extraordinary high levels with people who practice mindful meditation regularly.

Research shows mindfulness leads to significant changes in the brain-more cognitive flexibility, creativity and innovativeness, higher levels of well-being, better emotional regulation and more empathy, as reflected in increased levels of alpha and beta brain wave activity.

The National Institute of Health is currently financing more than 50 studies testing the potential health benefits of mindfulness techniques. A University of Pennsylvania study in which mindfulness meditation training was provided to a high stress U.S. military group preparing for deployment to Iraq has demonstrated a positive link between mindfulness training and improvements in mood and working memory.

Researchers at the University of Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School and MIT reported from their study of mindfulness that mindfulness practitioners were far more able to “turn down the volume” on distracting information and focus their attention better than non-mindfulness practitioners.

Mindfulness improves attention, memory problems solving, enhances the experience empathy and other positive emotions, lowers stress and is effective in the treatment of varied medical and mental healthy conditions such as ADHD, PSD, chronic pain, cancer, addiction and depression.

A study published in the Archives of General Psychiatry reported that mindfulness-based cognitive therapy delivered in a group format is as effective as antidepressant mediation in treating depression.

According to a study published in the journal, Psychoneuroendocrinology, the positive effects of mindfulness begin at the cellular level, altering levels of telomerase immune cells.

A study from the University of California Berkeley, published in the journal Emotion, studied the mind-body connection of professional dancers in comparison with accomplished mindfulness meditators, and found that the latter were more in sync with their bodies.

A study by Kirk Brown at the University of Rochester found that people high on a mindfulness scale were more aware of their unconscious processes and had more cognitive control and greater ability to shape what they do and what they say, than people lower on the mindfulness scale.

We need leaders in our organizations who practice mindfulness as a lifestyle skill and leadership competency.

Daniel Goleman, an acknowledged expert on emotional intelligence in leadership and organizations, writes in his book, Primal Leadership, “the first tasks of management has nothing to do with leading others; step one poses the challenge of knowing and managing oneself.” If leaders are constantly in the doing phase, without taking time for self-reflection and mindfulness, this knowing of oneself presents a serious challenge.

Richard Boyatzis, professor of organizational behavior at the Weatherhead School of Management at Case Western Reserve University, and author of Resonant Leadership, argues that good leaders attain resonance with those around them through self awareness and relationship management, all clearly connected to mindfulness.

To become mindful leaders and tap into that power, they must:

  • Let go of their belief in themselves as technical and problem solving geniuses and embrace the notion of becoming mindful partners. This requires building an awareness of and becoming more open to nuance and subtlety.
  • Be open to the concept of an unknown future. What we plan for today may not work tomorrow. To succeed in an unknown future, leaders must acknowledge mistakes quickly when things are not turning out as they predicted; be flexible enough to make changes quickly without defending their territory or ego;
  • Become skilled at leading through intuitive reflection rather than logical analysis;
  • Become more open and accepting of the world and others, and their differing points of view, rather than trying to reshape the world in the leader’s own image.
  • Become more mindful of what is going on in terms of their own thoughts, emotions and body and what is going in context. External mindfulness is being able to sense situations, being aware of the signals and cues in different contexts, and paying attention to them. Internal mindfulness is being aware of one’s body, emotions and thoughts and requires the ability and attitude to monitor one’s inner reality.

And mindfulness can have tremendous impact on workplace culture.

Many workplaces such as Raytheon, Procter and Gamble, Unilever, NortelNetowrks, Comcast, Yahoo, Google, eBay and Apple now offer employees classes in mindful meditation and senior executives such as Bill Ford Jr., Michael Stephen, Robert Shapiro and Michael Rennie practice regular mindful mediation as part of their regimen.

Green Mountain Coffee Roasters (GMCR) offers a Mindfulness Center at their facilities where employees can take year round retreats and workshops. GMCR returned roughly 3,400% in the stock market in the last decade, making it one of the best performing stocks during that period.

Our modern world has become unbalanced, with an excessive focus on doing and speed and multitasking, with little time for just “being” and reflection.  Mindfulness can restore that balance to leaders and workplaces.

Ray Williams

Self-esteem v. Self-compassion

High self-esteem does not predict better performance or greater success. And though people with high self-esteem do think they’re more successful, objectively, they are not. High self-esteem does not make you a more effective leader, a more appealing lover, more likely to lead a healthy lifestyle, or more attractive and compelling in an interview.

A growing body of research, suggest that self-compassion, rather than self-esteem, may be the key to unlocking your true potential for greatness.

Self-compassion is a willingness to look at your own mistakes and shortcomings with kindness and understanding – it’s embracing the fact that to err is indeed human. When you are self-compassionate in the face of difficulty, you neither judge yourself harshly, nor feel the need to defensively focus on all your awesome qualities to protect your ego. It’s not surprising that self-compassion leads to higher levels of personal well-being, optimism and happiness, and to less anxiety and depression.

-Talkspace

 

5 Simple Ways to Relax and Recharge

Many of us have a hard time relaxing. Maybe just the thought of taking a break actually stresses you. And that’s understandable. Because, as “a society we value being busy, so it can almost feel that we are doing something wrong by relaxing,” said Agnes Wainman, Ph.D, a clinical psychologist and self-proclaimed self-care activist in London, Ontario.

Christine Selby’s clients regularly tell her that relaxing is a waste of time because it means they’re not being productive. That’s when she asks them why they’d bother relaxing at all. They usually mention that relaxing feels good or helps them to wind down and destress. “My next question,” she added, “‘Is that not doing something?’”

Relaxing, in reality, is productive. According to Wainman, “Relaxing allows us to actually be more productive when we need to be, because we aren’t pushing ourselves to the brink of mental fatigue.”

“[R]elaxation has been shown time and time again to help reduce the effects of stress by slowing down many functions of the body that can break down after prolonged use,” Selby said. Relaxation can improve our mental health, including depression and anxiety.

Below, Selby and Wainman shared five simple ways you can relax.

Simply sit

“We are human ‘beings’ not human ‘doings,’” said Wainman, founder of London Psychological Services. She suggested sitting and taking several deep breaths. At first this might feel awkward (probably because it’s unfamiliar). That’s OK. Once you let go and begin breathing deeply, you’ll start relaxing. If it helps, close your eyes. 

Hug someone you trust

“Hugging can be a powerful form of relaxation,” said Selby, Ph.D, a clinical psychologist and author of the book Chilling Out: The Psychology of Relaxation. “Hugging someone you care about and who cares about you as well releases oxytocin, which is a hormone that helps in strengthening the emotional bond we have with others.” Research has found that hugging reduces blood pressure, stress and anxiety — but only when we hug someone we trust.

Also, the type of hug matters — you won’t find the same benefits with a brief or side hug, Selby said. “It really has to be the type where two people are wrapped up in each other’s arms and they stay that way for several seconds.” As you’re hugging, you’ll probably notice yourself breathing more slowly and deeply. Which fosters a greater sense of relaxation. 

Do something repetitive — that doesn’t require much attention

According to Wainman, this might be anything from putting beads on a string to putting rocks in a pile to drawing shapes. “It allows our mind to go on auto-pilot, but gives us something to do if just sitting and being feels too uncomfortable.” Plus, there’s something soothing about repetition, she said. Some of her clients also find crocheting to be rhythmic and calming.

Perform vigorous exercise

Exercise is another great way to relax, which might seem strange since it actually increases our heart rate and blood pressure, said Selby, co-founder of Selby Psychological Services in Bangor, Maine. But “the mechanism that has that energizing effect on the body when we exercise has an opposing counterpart that automatically kicks in when we stop exercising.”

That is, when we exercise, our fight or flight response is activated. When we stop exercising, that counterpart automatically slows everything down to a state of rest, she said.

When someone is stressed, a common suggestion is to run around the block or perform vigorous sit-ups or push-ups, she said. If you’re able to engage in vigorous exercise, which activities do you enjoy? (After all, enjoyment also is important.)

Pet your pet

This is one of Selby’s favorite relaxation tips to recommend to pet owners. She suggests patients sit or lay next to their pets and pet them (as opposed to playing with them). “The rhythmic act of petting, the warmth of their bodies and their breathing can all have a soothing, calming effect.” Even people who watch fish swimming in a tank seem to feel more relaxed — and experience a reduction in blood pressure.

Each of us deserves to take a break from all the doing and going to simply pause. Try the activities mentioned above — or use them as a starting point to brainstorm other activities you’d like to try.

If you’re having trouble relaxing, consider seeking professional support. According to Selby, some people experience “relaxation-induced anxiety.” That is, “while they are trying to relax, they will feel anxiety about not knowing how it is going to go, if they will ever feel relaxed, and what they are going to think about while relaxed.”

Either way, remember that relaxation is powerful. It’s important to prioritize it in your life — whether you’re scheduling it yourself or working with someone.

Margarita Tartakovsky, MS

How Pokémon Go Can Help with Anxiety, Depression

Pokemon GoI have to admit it. I’m 31. Officially out of the “youthful” age group, according to some of my favorite students. “Mrs. Meg, no one uses Facebook anymore. That’s for old people.” Fair enough.  So I must venture further to confirm that I am not all too shot down with playing the new Pokémon Go. I certainly cannot speak for all my contemporaries, though, nor those in older age brackets. This app, released a mere 7 days ago, has already surpassed total number of downloads and user than the Tinder app and has been projected by a number of people in the know to exceed the number of Twitter users soon. Which means, this app is currently spanning a number of age ranges and demographics and providing a number of positive benefits to the masses.

Apart from the joy of beating your friends in chasing down imaginary figures, this game actually has some mental health implications. Think about it. In order to gain the most points, you have to go the most places, right? One must get off the couch in order to catch (I’m going to keep calling them all “Pokémon”, because we’ve already established I’m not hip enough to know all the names of the characters). Your phone alerts you to the Pokémon in your area, so you have to get up off the couch and go get them if you want the points. They don’t just come to you.

I recently read a post on the old folks’ (remember, that’s Facebook) of a dad who admitted to the benefits of the game in relation to his own daughter. After dinner, it was his daughter’s idea to leash up the pup and go for a walk with the parents in order to catch two Pokémon out in their neighborhood. A young teen actually asked her parents to go on a walk with her! Granted, she still had her phone in hand, but I say, progress. While on the hunt for these two mythical creatures, the aforementioned girl walked 1.5 miles (exercise is linked to decreasing symptoms of depression and anxiety), and also stopped and talked to a brother and sister, 10 and 13 years old, respectively (having a common introductory topic can be helpful in decreasing social anxiety) who were chasing a Golding – oh look, I found out an actual name – while the dogs played (and who doesn’t love to watch lovable pups having fun in the park?).

Even if you don’t run into someone also on the hunt for a Pokéspot, having the motivation to get up and get outside (free Vitamin D and Serotonin, along with fresh air and additional steps) can be beneficial to those who have found themselves often couch-side due to negative emotional states. It can be possible for individuals to utilize the game to get on the move for health benefits, to achieve instant gratification, to enjoy playing a game with clearly defined boundaries and goals, and allows those participating to tap into our imagination and creativity.

Thoughts?

-MegAnne Duke, LCSW, LCDCi